Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wellbrink, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hiles, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Modeling Vigilance Performance as a Complex Adaptive System

Joerg Wellbrink, Ph.D.

The MOVES Institute, Naval Postgraduate School

Mike Zyda, Ph.D.

Director, the MOVES Institute, Naval Postgraduate School

John Hiles

The MOVES Institute, Naval Postgraduate School

Current cognitive models not only lack flexibility and realism, they struggle to model individual behavior and reduced performance. We propose that reduced human performance can be best modeled as a complex adaptive system. We built a multi-agent model, "Reduced Human Performance Model (RHPM)," as a proof of principle. The simulation system realistically simulates the reduction of vigilance that individuals experience during such operations as airport screening, radar-screen operation, and other vital tasks in which attention easily flags. The developed multi-agent system generates individual behavior within a reasonable range. Its use for computer-generated forces (i.e., radar screen operator) would improve the realism of simulation systems by adding human-like reduced vigilance performance. The model represents a well suited tool to mediate between vigilance theories such as signal detection theory and experimental data. Using the model as a surrogate generates insights that potentially create likely hypotheses to improve the theories.

Key Words: Cognitive architectures • human performance models • vigilance • complex adaptive system • attention

References

  • 1. Chorev, M. (Colonel, Israeli Armed Forces) 1996. Surprise Attack The Case of the Yom-Kippur War. Washington, D.C.: Industrial College of the Armed Forces.
  • 2. Pew, R. W., A. S. Mavor. 1998. Modeling Human and Organizational Behavior: Application to Military Simulation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Science.
  • 3. Ritter, F. E., Shadbolt, Nigel R., Elliman, David, Young, Gobet, Richard Fernand, Baxter, Gordon D. 1999. Techniques for Modeling Human Performance in Synthetic Environments: A Supplementary Review. Nottingham, UK: ESRC Centre for Research in Development, Instruction and Training, 1–92.
  • 4. Tenney, Yvette, et al. 2003. The AMBR Project: A Case-Study in Human Performance Model Comparison. 2003 Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (BRIMS). Scottsdale, AZ.
  • 5. Waldrop, M. M. 1992. Complexity: the Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York, NY: Touchstone.
  • 6. Wellbrink, Joerg. 2003. Reduced Human Performance Modeled as a Complex Adaptive System, Dissertation MOVES Institute. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.
  • 7. Newton, I. 1729. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/en/newton.htm. Last accessed January 2004.
  • 8. Gell-Mann, M. 1994. The Quark and the Jaguar Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. New York, NY: W.J. Freemann and Company.
  • 9. Arthur, W. B. 1994. Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality (The El Farol Problem). Amer. Econ. Review (Papers and Proceedings).
  • 10. Cowan, G. A., D. Pines, et al. 1994. Complexity: Metaphors, Models, and Reality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • 11. Arthur, W. B. 1999. Complexity and the Economy. Science 284, 107–109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • 12. Grilo, Antonio, Artur Caetano, Rosa Agostinho. 2000. Immune System Simulation through a Complex Adaptive System Model, CiteSeer Scientific Literature Digital Library.
  • 13. Ilachinski, A. 1997. Irreducible Semi-Autonomous Adaptive Combat (ISAAC): An Artificial-Life Approach to Land Warfare (U). Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analyses.
  • 14. Horne, G. E., M. K. Lauren 2000. Operational Synthesis Applied to Mutual NZ/U.S. Questions. Part I. Quantico, VA: Marine Corp Combat Development Command, 1–10.
  • 15. Hiles, J., M. VanPutte, et al. 2001. Innovations in Computer Generated Autonomy at the MOVES Institute. Monterey, CA: Modeling, Virtual Reality and Simulations (MOVES) Institute, Naval Postgraduate School.
  • 16. Tosey, P. 2002. Teaching at the Edge of Chaos. Surrey, UK: Teaching & Learning Forum for Colleagues in the School of Educational Studies.
  • 17. Matthews, G., D. Davies, et al. 2000. Human Performance Cognition, Stress and Individual Differences. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
  • 18. Mackworth, N. H. 1950. Researches on the Measurement of Human Performance. London, UK: HMSO, Medical Research Council.
  • 19. Davies, D., G. S. Tune. 1970. Human Vigilance Performance. London, UK: Trinity Press.
  • 20. Davies, D., R. Parasuraman 1982. The Psychology of Vigilance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • 21. Warm, J. 1984. Sustained Attention in Human Performance. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • 22. McKelvey, B. 2000. Complexity Theory in Organization Science: Seizing the Promise or Becoming a Fad. Emergence 1(1), 5–32.
  • 23. Wickens, C. 1992. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
  • 24. Wickens, C. 2002. Multiple Resources and Performance Prediction. Stanton Handbook, CA.
  • 25. Costa, P. T., R. McCrae 2000. NEO Software System for Windows Manual. Odessa, FL: PAR Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.
  • 26. Carley, K. M. 1996. Validating Computational Models. Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University.
  • 27. Goldberg, D. E. 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning. New York, NY: Addison Wesley.

The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 29-42 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/154851290400100103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wellbrink, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hiles, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?